The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1525•Celeste Wenegieme; Celestine Wenegieme v. Jeffrey Nadel
15-1525Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1525
CELESTE WENEGIEME; CELESTINE WENEGIEME,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JEFFREY NADEL; MERS; ARCH BAY; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING;
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02543-GLR)
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Celeste Wenegieme, Celestine Wenegieme, Appellants Pro Se.
Scott Elliot Nadel, LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY NADEL, Calverton,
Maryland; Mark David Meyer, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Celeste Wenegieme and Celestine Wenegieme appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint for
failure to state a claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Wenegieme v. Nadel, No. 1:14-cv-02543-GLR (D. Md. filed Apr. 13,
2015 & entered Apr. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.