Catherine Denise Randolph v. US ATTORNEY OF MARYLAND, Rod Rosenstein, et al; UNKNOWN

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1497
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US ATTORNEY OF MARYLAND, Rod Rosenstein, et al; UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-1786
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney General - Respondents et al
defendants: Melvin Bright,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-01137-JFM; 1:15-cv-02005-JFM )
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph
appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints
for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012).
We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by
the district court. Randolph v. US Attorney of Md., No. 1:15-
cv-01137-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 30, 2015; entered May 1, 2015);
Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM (D. Md. July 10, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --