The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1475•Charles Alford, Iii v. Martin & Gass, Inc.; Samuel G. Gass; Angler Construction Co., L.l.c.
15-1475Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1475
CHARLES ALFORD, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARTIN & GASS, INC.; SAMUEL G. GASS; ANGLER CONSTRUCTION CO.,
L.L.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:08-cv-00595-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Alford, III, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Pierce,
KASIMER & ANNINO, PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alford, III, appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reopen the case. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. Martin & Gass,
Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00595-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.