The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1372•Veronique K. Pongo; Francisco Avoki v. Bank of America
15-1372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 24, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1372
VERONIQUE K. PONGO; FRANCISCO AVOKI,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA; TRUSTEE SERVICE OF CAROLINA; AMERICA’S
WHOLESALE LENDER; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; BAC HOME
SERVICING; EAGLE, ADJUSTING SERVICE, INC.; DOES I-XX; MERS,
INC.; KIMBERLY DAWSON; BEVERLY BROOKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cv-00020-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veronique K. Pongo; Francisco Avoki, Appellants Pro Se. Kelli
A. Burns, Scott I. Perle, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North
Carolina; Franklin Lamont Greene, Gregory David Spink, Megan
McGee Stacy, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh,
North Carolina; Mica Nguyen Worthy, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG,
LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dismissed by Supreme Court, March 10, 2016
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Veronique K. Pongo and Francisco Avoki appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge, dismissing their complaint filed under the Truth in
Lending Act and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act,
and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their
remaining state law claims. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to
Appellants to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Pongo v. Bank of Am., No.
3:14-cv-00020-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.