The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1371•Damien Barker v. Computer Science Corporation
15-1371Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 24, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1371
DAMIEN BARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00857-LO-MSN)
Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damien Barker, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Richard Ward, III,
KULLMAN LAW FIRM, New Orleans, Louisiana; Frank Daniel Wood,
Jr., KULLMAN FIRM, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Damien Barker appeals the district court’s order granting
Computer Science Corporation’s summary judgment motion on his
harassment and discriminatory and retaliatory termination
claims, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. Barker v. Computer
Science Corp., No. 1:13-cv-00857 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.