The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1300•Carolyn E. Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven
15-1300Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1300
CAROLYN E. REED-SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SPARTANBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEVEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (7:11-cv-00970-JMC)
Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn E. Reed-Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Carlos C. Johnson,
Kenneth William Nettles, Jr., LYLES DARR & CLARK, LLP,
Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn E. Reed-Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reed-Smith’s informal brief does
not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Reed-Smith has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.