The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1286•Steven Clarke v. Dyncorp International LLC
15-1286Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 12, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1286
STEVEN CLARKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03267-JFM)
Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: August 12, 2015
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Matthew Branciforte,
LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Clarke appeals from the district court’s order
denying his: (1) motion to correct the record, (2) motion to
set aside judgment, (3) motion to re-open the case, and, (4)
motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Clarke v. DynCorp Int’l LLC, No. 8:12-cv-
03267-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.