The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1225•Frank Prempeh v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
15-1225Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1225
FRANK PREMPEH,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: September 16, 2015 Decided: October 2, 2015
Before KING, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sam H. Hasan, HASAN LAW GROUP, Falls Church, Virginia, for
Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant
Attorney General, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Assistant Director,
Zoe J. Heller, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frank Prempeh, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying
his motion to reconsider its affirmance of the Immigration
Judge’s decision finding his asylum application untimely and
denying his request for withholding of removal. Upon review of
the administrative record and Prempeh’s claims, we find no abuse
of discretion in the denial of reconsideration. See Narine v.
Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009). We accordingly deny
the petition for review. See In re: Prempeh (B.I.A. Feb. 2,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.