The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1167•JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent v. Donald Sullivan, a/k/a James D. Sullivan
15-1167Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1167
JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD SULLIVAN, a/k/a James D. Sullivan,
Defendant – Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00287-FL)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory
Attorney, Robert Joel Branman, Lee Perla, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the United States in an interpleader
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Pendergrass v. Sullivan, No. 5:14-cv-00287-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.