The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1003•Dora E. Caudle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
15-1003Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1003
DORA E. CAUDLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
(Tax Ct. No. 18735-13L)
Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dora E. Caudle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joel Branman, Bruce R.
Ellisen, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC; William J.
Wilkins, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dora Caudle appeals from the tax court’s order upholding
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s proposed levy action with
respect to her 2005 and 2006 income tax liability. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Caudle v.
Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 18735-13L (U.S.T.C. Oct. 2,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.