The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7767•Willie Joe Sturkey v. Director of Scdc
14-7767Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7767
WILLIE JOE STURKEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR OF SCDC; J. GASTON; LIEUTENANT BOUY, in their
individual capacity, in their official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-03451-RMG)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Joe Sturkey, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Willcox Buyck,
Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK, SANDERS & SIMMONS, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Joe Sturkey appeals the district court’s order
accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny his motions to appoint counsel and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sturkey v.
Dir. of SCDC, No. 2:13-cv-03451-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.