Louis Rychwalski, Jr. v. Cms

14-7365Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 13, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7365
LOUIS RYCHWALSKI, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CMS; WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN; CPT. ROBERT J. MOORE; PAUL
ZIOLKOWSKI; WILLIAM MAYCOCK; ROBERT C. MCGEE; JOHN BROMLEY;
CHARLES WESTBROOK; CRAIG REID; WILLIAM FISHER; WEXFORD
HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; MARYAM MESSFOROSH, P.A.; JASON CLEM,
M.D.; BRUCE FORD, P.A.; PAUL MATERA, M.D.; TERRY DAVIS,
P.A.; CORIZON, LLC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02082-GLR)
Submitted: January 26, 2015 Decided: April 13, 2015
Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis Rychwalski, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Jacquelyn
Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.,
Towson, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant
Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,
RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Louis Rychwalski, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Rychwalski v. CMS,
No. 1:13-cv-02082-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.