The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7277•Anthony Badu v. Richard O. Broadwell, Iii; Nurse K. Hull; Nurse M. Gaskill
14-7277Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7277
ANTHONY BADU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD O. BROADWELL, III; NURSE K. HULL; NURSE M. GASKILL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03192-F)
Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Badu, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth
Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, Jodi
Harrison, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Badu appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Badu v. Broadwell, No. 5:11-ct-03192-F (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.