The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7023•Douglas Thompson v. Captain Kelley; Lieutenant Harriet
14-7023Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7023
DOUGLAS THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN KELLEY; LIEUTENANT HARRIET,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TURBEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCDC; INMATE JAMES
PILGRIM,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (0:12-cv-02220-CMC)
Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh Willcox,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Thompson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint and reopen his case. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Kelley, No.
0:12-cv-02220-CMC (D.S.C. June 3, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.