The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6957•United States of America v. Devronn Demonn Riddick
14-6957Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 13, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6957
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEVRONN DEMONN RIDDICK,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:10-cr-00070-RBS-FBS-2)
Submitted: November 5, 2014 Decided: November 13, 2014
Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Devronn Demonn Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James
Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Devronn Demonn Riddick appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion filed in his
criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Riddick, No. 2:10-
cr-00070-RBS-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. May 14, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.