The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6953•United States of America v. Paul Bernard Mitchell, Jr.
14-6953Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6953
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PAUL BERNARD MITCHELL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:09-cr-00382-H-1)
Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Bernard Mitchell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank
Bradsher, Timothy Severo, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Bernard Mitchell, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion
for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Mitchell, No. 5:09-cr-00382-H-1
(E.D.N.C. June 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.