The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6873•Kareem Milhouse v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden
14-6873Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6873
KAREEM MILHOUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden; ODOM; J. GULLY; A. MCCUNE; G. SPAK;
SAUNDERS; UNITED STATES; JOHN DOES 1-10,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00016-IMK-JES)
Submitted: November 17, 2014 Decided: December 2, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Milhouse, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kareem Milhouse appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and conclude that Milhouse fails to
establish reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Milhouse v. O’Brien,
No. 1:14-cv-00016-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va. May 9, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.