The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6761•Robert James Miller, Jr. v. RILEY MAXWELL, Assistant Solicitor
14-6761Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6761
ROBERT JAMES MILLER, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RILEY MAXWELL, Assistant Solicitor; JEFF TALBERT; MAGGIE
BOYD; BILL DOVE; JEFF WESTFALL, Investigators for the
Fairfield County Sheriff's Office, each in their individual
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00340-JFA)
Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: October 2, 2014
Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert James Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert James Miller, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Miller v. Maxwell, No. 3:14-cv-00340-JFA (D.S.C. May 8, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.