The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6724•Kyle Delano Smith v. Department of Corrections Sussex Istate Prison
14-6724Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6724
KYLE DELANO SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SUSSEX I STATE PRISON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00058-HEH-MHL)
Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kyle Delano Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kyle Delano Smith appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit without prejudice.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Smith v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:14-cv-00058-HEH-MHL (E.D.
Va. May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.