The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6700•Wayne Resper v. Secretary, Dpscs; Oakley Igo; Commissioner of Corrections
14-6700Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6700
WAYNE RESPER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY, DPSCS; OAKLEY IGO; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:13-cv-03431-PJM)
Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion for
reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v.
Secretary, DPSCS, No. 8:13-cv-03431-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 28 &
Apr. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.