The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6684•Gary B. Williams v. CARL EASON, State Judge, Suffolk Circuit Court, Mr.
14-6684Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6684
GARY B. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CARL EASON, State Judge, Suffolk Circuit Court, Mr.;
GREGORY K. MATTHEWS, Attorney at law,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00493-HEH)
Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Eason, No.
3:13-cv-00493-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.