The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6544•Charles Robert Morris, Iii v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of D.D.C.
14-6544Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6544
CHARLES ROBERT MORRIS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of D.D.C.; WARDEN OF COFFEE WOOD;
COFFEE WOOD MEDICAL STAFF, Medical Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00022-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robert Morris, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Morris, III, appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Morris v. Clarke,
No. 2:14-cv-00022-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.