The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6314•United States of America v. Terrell Anthony Hargrove, a/k/a Rell
14-6314Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6314
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERRELL ANTHONY HARGROVE, a/k/a Rell,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00026-JAG-1)
Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrell Anthony Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles
Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terrell Anthony Hargrove appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion, brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2012) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32, to correct
errors in his presentence report. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Hargrove, No. 3:06-cr-00026-JAG-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.