The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6275•United States of America v. Travis McLean
14-6275Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6275
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAVIS MCLEAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:10-cr-00104-FL-1; 5:12-cv-00515-FL)
Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Sebastian Kielmanovich,
Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Travis McLean appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
McLean’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McLean,
Nos. 5:10-cr-00104-FL-1; 5:12-cv-00515-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.