The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6225•United States of America v. Nathan Kinta Wilkins, a/k/a Kat Daddy
14-6225Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6225
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NATHAN KINTA WILKINS, a/k/a Kat Daddy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (4:08-cr-00043-FL-1)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Kinta Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. William Glenn Perry,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North
Carolina; Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Kinta Wilkins appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Wilkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilkins,
Nos. 4:08-cr-00043-FL-1; 4:11-cv-00179-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.