The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-4042•United States of America v. Shawntae Deshawn Rogers
14-4042Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-4042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SHAWNTAE DESHAWN ROGERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:13-cr-00208-TDS-1)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
J. Scott Coalter, COALTER LAW P.L.L.C., Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney,
Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shawntae DeShawn Rogers appeals his conviction entered
pursuant to his conditional guilty plea to possession of
ammunition by a convicted felon. On appeal, he challenges the
denial of his motion to suppress. We have reviewed the parties’
briefs and the record, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Rogers, No. 1:13-cr-00208-TDS-1
(M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2013). (J.A. at 81-93). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.