The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-2196•Demetra Milladge v. Oto Development, LLC
14-2196Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2196
DEMETRA MILLADGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00194-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: June 30, 2015 Decided: July 22, 2015
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Teresa Burke Wright, Meredith F.
Bergeson, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Demetra Milladge appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of OTO Development, LLC, in her
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Milladge v. OTO Development, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00194-CMH-
JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.