The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-2154•Maureen Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc.; Robert Washington
14-2154Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 7, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2154
MAUREEN UCHE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY HOSPICE, INC.; ROBERT WASHINGTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-00878-ELH)
Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maureen Uche, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Richard Engel, Michael
John Neary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Maureen Uche appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and several other
orders. We have considered the claims raised in Uche’s informal
brief and conclude that the district court committed no error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Uche v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-00878-ELH
(D. Md. Oct. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.