The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-2128•Timothy Valenzia v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners
14-2128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 8, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2128
TIMOTHY VALENZIA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00243-CCB)
Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 8, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Darryl
G. McCallum, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Valenzia appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Baltimore City Board
of School Commissioners in his employment discrimination action.
We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on
appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Valenzia v.
Baltimore City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:12-cv-00243-CCB (D.
Md. Sept. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.