The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1844•Latasha Lorraine Askins v. Starting Point; Heather Quenault; Maria Roundtree; Larry Wiseburn
14-1844Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1844
LATASHA LORRAINE ASKINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STARTING POINT; HEATHER QUENAULT; MARIA ROUNDTREE; LARRY
WISEBURN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:12-cv-03547-RBH)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Latasha Lorraine Askins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward
Justice, Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM &
LANEY, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Latasha Lorraine Askins appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Askins’
complaint alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Askins v.
Starting Point, No. 4:12-cv-03547-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2014).
We also deny Askins’ motion to assign counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.