The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1635•Mansa Musa-Bey v. WILLIAM M. DUNN, Master in Chancery; JOSEPH J. DIPRIMIO
14-1635Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1635
MANSA MUSA-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM M. DUNN, Master in Chancery; JOSEPH J. DIPRIMIO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01896-WMN)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mansa Musa-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mansa Musa-Bey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Musa-Bey’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, Musa-Bey has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.