Kim Williams v. Kettler Management Inc.; Aimco Properties, Lp

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1610
KIM WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KETTLER MANAGEMENT INC.; AIMCO PROPERTIES, LP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(8:12-cv-01226-CBD)
Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kim Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri E. Cleary, Michael John
Neary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland;
Steven G. Metzger, Mark S. Saudek, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES,
LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kim Williams appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting
the summary judgment motions of Kettler Management, Inc.
(“Kettler”) and AIMCO Properties, L.P. (“AIMCO”) on his claims
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e et seq. (2012), Md. Code. Ann., State Gov’t § 20-601 et
seq. (West 2015), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), and Kettler’s
counterclaim for breach of contract. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Williams v. Kettler
Mgmt. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01226-CBD (D. Md. June 11, 2014).
We deny Williams’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before us and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --