The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1562•Linwood Gray v. Howard L. Stern; Sandra M. Stern
14-1562Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1562
LINWOOD GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOWARD L. STERN; SANDRA M. STERN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PEOPLES BANK OF MARYLAND,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02219-CCB)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin Frederick, Daniel Russell
Hodges, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Linwood Gray appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action as untimely filed. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Stern,
No. 8:13-cv-02219-CCB (D. Md. May 7, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.