The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1410•In re: WILLIAM L. HANDY, JR., a/k/a B.
14-1410Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1410
In Re: WILLIAM L. HANDY, JR., a/k/a B.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(8:04-cr-00559-AW-7; 8:09-cv-02011-AW;
8:13-cv-00477-AW)
Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William L. Handy, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William L. Handy, Jr., petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed
acting on his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the
district court denied Handy’s motion in December 2013.
Accordingly, because the district court has decided Handy’s
case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.