The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1381•Donald Dickens v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
14-1381Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1381
DONALD DICKENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00076-IMK-JSK)
Submitted: August 20, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Dickens, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Marc Gianola, Aaron M.
Ponzo, Christopher Thomas Sasada, Timothy Richard Smith, PION
JOHNSTON NERONE GIRMAN CLEMENTS & SMITH, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Dickens appeals the district court’s order
granting Werner Enterprises, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment
on his libel and tortious interference claims. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickens v. Werner
Enterprises, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-00076-IMK-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Mar.
25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.