The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1353•Sharon Thomas v. Orange County Government
14-1353Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1353
SHARON THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; UNC HEALTHCARE
SYSTEM,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00078-CCE-LPA)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sharon Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, James R.
Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-
Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Thomas appeals the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to the defendants upon finding Thomas’ claims
barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Thomas leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Thomas v. Orange Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:10-cv-
00078-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.