The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1319•Jermaine Bolden v. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway LLC
14-1319Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1319
JERMAINE BOLDEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:13-cv-01265-DKC)
Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermaine Bolden, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Cantrell,
MCCABE WEISBERG & CONWAY, LLC, Laurel, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jermaine Bolden appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider and amend his complaint
alleging violations of consumer protection laws. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Bolden v. McCabe, No. 8:13-cv-01265-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.