The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1307•MARTIN PATRICK SHEEHAN, Trustee - v. Karl K. Warner
14-1307Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1307
MARTIN PATRICK SHEEHAN,
Trustee - Appellant,
v.
KARL K. WARNER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00165-IMK; 1:10-00888; 1:10-00100)
Submitted: October 24, 2014 Decided: November 3, 2014
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin P. Sheehan, SHEEHAN & NUGENT, PLLC, Wheeling, West
Virginia, for Appellant. Edward R. Kohout, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Martin Patrick Sheehan, the bankruptcy trustee,
appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy
court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the
court’s orders determining that there was no transfer of
property and therefore denying Sheehan’s motions for summary
judgment and for reconsideration of that order. We have
reviewed the record and the briefs filed on appeal, and we find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Sheehan v. Warner, No. 1:13-cv-
00165-IMK (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.