The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1306•Reginald B. Stewart v. United States of America
14-1306Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1306
REGINALD B. STEWART,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CELINA M. INMAN; VALERIE A. HUTTON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-
cv-03610-PWG)
Submitted: September 22, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eden Brown Gaines, BROWN GAINES, LLC, White Plains, Maryland,
for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney,
Victor M. Lawrence, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court’s order
denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart
v. United States, No. 8:13-cv-03610-PWG (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.