The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1237•Gregory Walsh v. One West Bank, Fsb; John Does 1-10/jane Doe 1-10
14-1237Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1237
GREGORY WALSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ONE WEST BANK, FSB; JOHN DOES 1-10/JANE DOE 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01094-LO-TCB)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory J. Walsh, Appellant Pro Se. Billy Bernard Ruhling, II,
TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Michael R.
Sklaire, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory J. Walsh appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his amended complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court at the hearing held on March 7,
2014, and in its order of dismissal. Walsh v. One West Bank,
FSB, No. 1:13-cv-01094-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.