The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1134•Thomas A. Murray v. ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director
14-1134Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1134
THOMAS A. MURRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas A. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Rose McNeill,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Murray appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Murray
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his motion to remand
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Murray v. Accomack Cnty. Health Dep’t, No. 2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM
(E.D. Va. filed Sept. 19, 2013 & entered Sept. 20, 2013; filed
Dec. 10, 2013 & entered Dec. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.