The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1128•Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr. v. Christopher Cyran, (7816); City of Gaithersburg, Inc.
14-1128Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1128
ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER CYRAN, (#7816); CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-03354-PJM)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock
Karpinski, Michael B. Rynd, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adol Owen-Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reopen or reconsider the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Owen-Williams v. Cyran, No. 8:11-cv-03354-PJM (D. Md.
Jan. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.