The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1099•Ronald Luber v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland
14-1099Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1099
RONALD LUBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND; LAURA A. NEWMAN, County
Executive, In Her Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00001-JKB)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Luber, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Luber appeals a district court order dismissing
his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012)
for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the court’s
memorandum and the record and affirm for the reasons stated by
the court. See Luber v. Anne Arundel Cnty., Md., No. 1:14-cv-
00001-JKB (D. Md. entered Jan. 13, 2014, filed Jan. 14, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.