The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1057•Douglas E. McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc.
14-1057Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 13, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1057
DOUGLAS E. MCPHAIL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00645-BO)
Submitted: May 28, 2014 Decided: June 13, 2014
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas E. McPhail, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Elliot Bayzle,
PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas E. McPhail appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing the federal claims in his civil action for failure to
state a claim, declining to exercise jurisdiction over the
remaining state claims and remanding them to state court. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Servs., Inc., No.
5:13-cv-00645-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.