The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-8062•United States of America v. Christopher Ray Parrish
13-8062Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8062
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER RAY PARRISH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00099-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00166-FL)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Ray Parrish, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley,
Evan Rikhye, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Ray Parrish appeals the district court’s
order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Parrish, No. 5:08-cr-00099-FL-1
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.