The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-8059•William Douglas Dawson, Jr. v. Captain Rhonda Abston
13-8059Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8059
WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN RHONDA ABSTON; WARDEN MICHAEL MCCALL; ASSISTANT
WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY; ASSISTANT WARDEN DENIS BUSH,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(4:13-cv-01366-DCN-TER)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Douglas Dawson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Arlene
Thomas, THOMPSON & HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying Dawson’s request for a preliminary injunction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Dawson v. Abston, No. 4:13-cv-01366-DCN-TER (D.S.C. Dec.
12, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.