The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7948•Larry R. Tart v. VICKIE SELLERS; MICHAEL SLAGLE; JOBE, Lieutenant
13-7948Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7948
LARRY R. TART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VICKIE SELLERS; MICHAEL SLAGLE; JOBE, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-00282-FDW)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry R. Tart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry R. Tart appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012),
and his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Sellers, No.
1:13-cv-00282-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2013). We deny Tart’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.