The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7918•Gregory S. Hines v. Warden Randall C. Mathena
13-7918Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 10, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7918
GREGORY S. HINES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA; HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC,
Director; EBP ISRAEL HAMILTON, Re-Entry Institutional
Program Manager; JEFFERY ARTRIP, Unit Manager D. Bldg; TORI
RAIFORD, Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:13-cv-00288-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: April 3, 2014 Decided: July 10, 2014
Before DUNCAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory S. Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory S. Hines appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Hines v. Mathena, No. 7:13-cv-00288-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.