The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7895•Ricky Gamble v. William Bullard; Sergeant Green; Officer Gaddy
13-7895Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7895
RICKY GAMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BULLARD; SERGEANT GREEN; OFFICER GADDY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
OFFICER CRIBB,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03220-FL)
Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Gamble appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint, and has also filed a motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
Gamble v. Bullard, No. 5:11-ct-03220-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.