The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-7882•Allen Wayne Poston v. ROBERT CONRAD, JR., Judge
13-7882Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7882
ALLEN WAYNE POSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT CONRAD, JR., Judge; VENTO, Assistant US Attorney;
ODULIO, Assistant US Attorney; ERIC DAVIS, Special Agent
(FBI); STITITE, Special Agent (FBI); JOHN CACHERIS,
Attorney; JOE BILL PUTNAM; HARRY PUTNAM; DENNIS DEVINE;
PHOEBE DEVINE; DOUGLAS WAYNE COBB; G. K. DAVIS; DAVID
MUSICK; TRAVIS KISER; JACK LEDBETTER; DOE 1, Spouse of
Douglas Wayne Cobb,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00586-FDW)
Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Wayne Poston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Allen Wayne Poston appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six unknown
Names Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),
as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court but
modify the dismissal to be without prejudice to Poston’s right
to refile if his conviction is invalidated or called into
question by the appropriate court. Poston v. Conrad, No. 3:13-
cv-00586-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.